On the floor right now are three things Ms. Jennings said and then three things Mr. Ménard said. We have a lot up in the air.
Number one, based on what Ms. Jennings said, we wouldn't even be hearing from the minister or from the experts within the department, because you're saying not to hear from witnesses we've already heard from on Bill C-27. There have been some amendments, as all members know, from what was in Bill C-27 to what is now in Bill C-2. Obviously, when we heard witnesses in the previous meetings, those would be eminent experts on this law. We need the benefit of hearing from them on the amendments that were made and on the bill. I don't think we should be limiting ourselves in that way.
Obviously, as a committee we're going to come to some agreement on who we should hear from, but we have to be careful before we come out with a broad motion that says we will not hear from certain witnesses we have heard from already. That sort of motion hamstrings us too much and limits potentially valuable testimony when we may need the benefit of their advice on the amendments that might be helpful.