Perhaps I could probe your question a little bit more.
The bill has several components. In the provisions with respect to impaired driving there are changes to the penalties, in the provisions with respect to serious gun crimes there are mandatory minimum penalties, and then in the dangerous offenders proceedings it's based on somebody who has already been convicted of serious violent crimes. So in that context, the negotiation of an outcome would perhaps have already occurred for the previous conviction.
Was there any particular context you're asking about?