What is it exactly that the convicted person would have to prove here in order to rebut the presumption? If you were acting for a convicted person and you walked into one of these hearings where there was presumption A, B, C, D.... There isn't going to be an A, B, C, D; you are simply one of those DOs.
Can you tell me what you would try to prove in order to rebut? What exactly are you trying to rebut?