No. To be fair, though, in that particular instance that was under a previous set of laws. I think the original case, the original decision, was in 1978. The long-term offender designation was not available. I would suggest that in that particular case, had that happened today, it would have been quite a different outcome. Most likely a part XXIV application would have been sought. Even if a dangerous offender designation was not successful, you probably would have seen a long-term offender designation.
Again, we do take a look at these as they come in. Have we actually done studies? The point of my answer is that we do undertake studies. There are reports of the working group, for example, that have been released publicly. One was in 1995, just prior to the 1997 one. The high-risk offender working group also published a report, I think, on the sex offender registry, which was released a number of years ago and resulted in Bill C-16, passed by the House of Commons a few years ago.
Again, its work right now in relation to this bill is still being vetted among the provinces, but that may be released at some point as well.