Yes, we have. We've done our analysis. We've taken a hard look at this.
I can also point you to more recent case law. The Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Grayer, as a matter of fact, suggested that the right to remain silent in a dangerous offender proceeding is something that the offender can exercise, but to his detriment. When the evidence is there that he poses a threat of future harm to society and he chooses not to speak, chooses not to participate in any respect in the assessment process or in the actual hearing itself, then the court is going to make the determination, whether he speaks or not.