No. In that particular case the presumption may well apply. If you have, for example, three different victims months apart, clearly the intent of these provisions is that the presumption would apply in that case, because there is no nexus between the different offences. In that case the actual sentencing court would be saying “Okay, for this offence I'm going to give you two years, for that offence I'm going to give you two years, and for that offence I'm going to give you two years, and then for the current offence I give you two years”. Clearly, the intent of this provision is that the presumption would kick in at that point.
On October 31st, 2007. See this statement in context.