Something you said kind of struck home.
Is that what we're talking about here--someone who has met the criteria for dangerous offender but who, it's been decided, is going to be handled as a long-term offender? Time goes by, and they reoffend. That, in effect, is the difference this change is making under Bill C-2. It will mean not having to wait until this person commits another violent sexual offence before having a rehearing of the dangerous offender.
Is that what we're talking about here, the difference in our justice system's being able to have that here where it's obvious tougher controls are needed because the person has breached some pretty stringent controls, without having to wait for that person to victimize somebody? Is that the difference?