If in fact there is a specific reference made in your normal DO application to one of those subsections, then the follow-up question from me is, what happens when there's a presumption that all of the subsections have been met and are presumed to have been met? That's what this new provision does provide, that there's a presumption that all of them have been met. How does the offender know which of these particulars he would be expected to rebut in dealing with the presumption?
