If in fact there is a specific reference made in your normal DO application to one of those subsections, then the follow-up question from me is, what happens when there's a presumption that all of the subsections have been met and are presumed to have been met? That's what this new provision does provide, that there's a presumption that all of them have been met. How does the offender know which of these particulars he would be expected to rebut in dealing with the presumption?
On November 1st, 2007. See this statement in context.