I guess I've probably run out of time now, but, Mr. Muise, I'd like to strongly urge you to continue to lobby for your point of view. I'd really appreciate that.
There will be those who will say, why do we have to go this far for a small number of people who would be deemed dangerous offenders? I want to go on record here. Some may argue against this bill, but I think we have to look at the number of victims as a priority rather than the so-called small number of predators. If you were to have, say, 50 dangerous offender candidates over the next ten years, it's likely that each one of those people could have assaulted or victimized five to ten people, so now you're up into the range of 400 or 500 victims. That's important. Our duty is to protect our people from predators in our society, and that's what this bill is for.
I guess that was more of a statement than a question, but I would love to have your comments on that, if there is any time.