I don't have actual numbers. What I can tell you is that the requests by a number of provincial attorneys general is directly related to that particular issue. You have these people who many of us believe are dangerous offenders, but in light of Regina v. Johnson, they are on LTO orders, including some people who have, for instance, 24-hour protection beside them, shadowing them as they go about being LTOs and things like that.
I think I would answer your question by saying that Bill C-2 and the new amendments that have been included as a result of the concerns raised by the provincial attorneys general are going to respond to those very offenders who are inclined to commit new serious personal injury offences, sexual offences, and in particular and significantly those who are going to in some way breach their LTOs, their long-term offender orders. The very kinds of people who are out there as LTOs and are prepared to breach, and do breach--those are the ones who will go on to reoffend in a serious way, because we're talking about that small minority.