With respect to breach of long-term supervision order, it's very important to realize that we're not looking necessarily simply for further offences. The individual was assessed by experts to begin with under his or her first part XXIV hearing, and there were, no doubt, found to be certain things that escalate the risk. Perhaps the individual has a drug or alcohol problem, or perhaps being near children or a public park or something such as that is a catalyst for future offences. So quite often when we're pursuing a breach of long-term supervision order charge, we're looking at one of those things, and it's incredibly important that that be addressed as a very significant elevation of risk. When the individual has begun drinking when he or she shouldn't be because doing so has resulted in offences before, that's something as serious as committing another offence in terms of managing the risk. That's what it's all about.
Clause 43 in Bill C-2, which calls for a mandatory assessment for a breach of long-term supervision order, is a blessing. We've never had access to that situation. So we've gathered up all the same evidence for any part XXIV hearing, only we can't present it to an expert unless there's some consent, and that's unlikely to happen.