I think that will occur because all the crown has to show is that it's the third offence in those cases, and then the burden shifts to the accused to go and show that he didn't have...or he's not dangerous for whatever reasons. That might be very difficult. There's this presumption of three convictions against him, and now he's going to have to marshal the kind of evidence he can to show that he shouldn't get an indeterminate sentence for the following reasons, and that he's not dangerous. I think that's going to be a difficult situation as well from a resource standpoint.
On November 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.