Just on the use of psychiatric evidence, Mr. Rady, it is used now. There are court decisions that say it can be used against the accused. There is protection--I would say protection--or at least an element that there is a mandatory examination. Don't you see that this is justifiable in the sense that there are a number of tools already in the kit--we haven't talked about them--for the offender and his lawyer to use?
On November 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.