When Mr. Cooper was here last week he suggested that some amendments to part XXIV would be useful in prosecuting dangerous offenders. I don't know if you've had a chance to look at what he was saying, but do you have any comments as to whether they are valid or whether they would survive a Constitution or a charter challenge?
Second, there have been suggestions that we impose specific duties on the crown to bring dangerous offender applications under a set criteria, and then the countervail against that would be that it's constitutionally improper because that's the responsibility of the provincial governments.
The third one is to you, Mr. Rady. Do you know how much it costs legal aid on average to defend a dangerous offender application?