I'm glad you asked, because that was something I didn't get a chance to say anything about, and I think it's so complex that this particular offence is going to have this mandatory minimum and this one is going to have this mandatory minimum. It's just not realistic to think that the kinds of crimes committed by people with firearms is going to stop because it's going to be one year more or one year less—number one.
Number two, I think there's a real issue just for me as a citizen and as someone sensitive to families of victims of crime and as a mother and all the rest; there's a real issue about saying that sexual assault with a firearm, for example, is so much further than sexual assault with a machete. Frankly, I see that both are horrible crimes. So I'm just a little concerned about the fact that the mandatory minimums are going in on certain things, not on other things that might be equally horrendous, and that we're presuming that people on the streets, who are out there with illegal weapons, are going to say they'd better not touch this one, they're going to get a year extra. That's my concern there.