We already see it now with the operation of pre-existing mandatory minimums. For instance, you see a relatively young offender, and you have a fabulous pre-sentence report. Everybody in the community has said there's no history of violence, but the judge has no option but to sentence to the mandatory minimum because the crime was committed with a firearm. We see this regularly, and if you were able to have judges here before you who would be able to talk about this, they would talk about how the quality of justice suffers from their not being able to make those distinctions. You're taking someone who potentially could be a very constructive member of society, putting them into a prison, which is going to be a school for crime, and making them feel that there's no hope and no way out of it. I think that is the sort of situation that makes people a bit anxious.
The problem is that with the 25 designated offences and the 12 primary designated offences, you have a pretty vast blackboard there of offences that will be caught in this.