I was going to ask to summarize this because I did miss part of the point I wanted to make on this section.
I don't agree entirely. Clearly, what triggers what requires the explanation from the prosecutor is whether they fit into the category of a designated offence. The other part of this that's offensive, Mr. Chair—and I haven't made this point yet—is the constitutional balance of power between the provinces and the federal government and who has authority to do what. The prosecutor is under the administration of justice. That clearly is a provincial responsibility. We're imposing federal jurisdiction in the provincial area. There's going to be a double challenge on this. There's going to be a challenge based on the powers in the Constitution between the provinces and the federal government, and there's going to be a challenge, I believe, on the charter as well.