Just quickly, I believe that on the offences Mr. Comartin set out, we're not dealing with mandatory minimum penalties. We're talking about the dangerous offender provisions of the bill. That's number one.
Number two, we have to also couple the offence with the sentence a convicted offender received for that offence. Under this bill, in order to trigger the provisions of this bill, a person has to have been tried, convicted, and sentenced to two years or more. So to Ms. Jennings' point, a person is not convicted and sent to prison for two years for putting his or her hands on someone. A judge would not convict someone with a two-year sentence for that.
I think that in the vast majority of cases for which someone gets a sentence of two years or more, it's going to be a more serious circumstance, and that is why that additional provision is in the bill.
I hear what the members are saying, but they have to take that in light of the further trigger, that being that the person had received a sentence of two years or more for each of those acts.