I'm thinking of individuals I've run against in the past. Paul Zed...that explains some things.
I would like to get your comments. I heard a lot of questions in the first round about why don't we just do this or that. Everything we're dealing with and everything you've been tasked with in drafting this piece of legislation has to be seen through the filter of the constitutional constraints we have.
You did touch on this a bit in response to Mr. Lukiwski, but I'm wondering if you could hit the high spots on where flexibilities have to be left in place and where, in the case of the Prime Minister and the Governor General, necessary discretion has to be left, without getting into constitutional amendments. So in light of our current constraints, how does this bill have to be shaped in a way that we have some genuine consultation and democrat input while respecting the limits we're currently faced with?