The firm did not look at that.
I'm pointing out that what's being proposed is a transitional system that would be in place for a year, before the end of the second year, between year one and year two, with no certainty that a consultation would occur. The question arises as to whether the efforts to get ready for that are worth it. Even though it's a much easier system compared with STV, there are still all sorts of efforts needed in terms of technology, and in terms of training and making sure that candidates understand the rules, etc. The question is whether the efforts related to that are worth it, given that at the same time we would have to be ready for the STV regime, which would kick in the year after—again with no certainty that the consultations would be held in that interim period. So that's the point.