That's a broad question.
First, with respect to carrying out those selection processes in parallel with provincial legislation, again it's the Prime Minister at the time of the issuing of the order who would determine whether, given the legal regime in place, it would be appropriate to hold the consultation in parallel with provincial legislation.
With respect to STV and its benefits, the main benefit of STV assumes there's more than one candidate to be elected for the same district; otherwise, I'm not sure there is more real value for this. However, the minute you want to appoint three or four candidates for the same territory, the STV allows giving the most value to the electors' choices. If an elector comes in and votes for Candidate A and finds at the end of the day that Candidate A has been elected by a majority of 10,000, he may feel that had he known that, he would have voted for Candidate B, because Candidate B was his second-best candidate. STV allows the elector to do just that: number one is this candidate; number two is this one. If my vote is not needed to elect candidate number one, I would like it to be transferred to candidate number two.
It's a better reflection of the choice of the electors when you have to fill more than one seat.