Mr. Hogg, would you like to react to that at all? After all, on page 1 of your presentation, you say: “Obviously, the bill assumes that the Prime Minister would be under a political imperative to respect the outcome of the consultation he has ordered...”
The bill provides a flexible way to get around constitutional rules. But you agree with me that, politically, they are in fact moving towards Senate reform.
So are they not doing indirectly what they cannot do directly?