The convention I was referring to, Professor Mendes, was the convention regarding consulting the provinces on changes to the Constitution of Canada, and there is no question in anybody's mind that has been replaced by the amending formulae that were set in place in 1982. That's what I'm referring to.
With regard to the prerogatives of the crown, I think you've just made my case for me: that the prerogative of the crown remains effectively untouched by the amendments that took place in 1982. Therefore previous cases that dealt with the prerogatives of the crown are highly relevant, and therefore a leading case on this subject, which is the 1919 case, is entirely relevant.
Therefore, I ask you again how you interpret the applicability of that case to this kind of situation.