The first of the three Es of the triple-E Senate is that it's elected, which I agree with, but the triple-E model never actually specified how the election would take place, and that's why it's incomplete. It's an effective Senate, which is again somewhat undefined, but it's also an equal Senate. I'm not convinced that equal provincial representation is appropriate given the tremendous variation among provincial populations in Canada. You don't want a Senate that replicates representation by population in the House of Commons, but to me, to go as far from that as the triple-E model would suggest is not acceptable.
I think we're looking for some kind of blended model. That's fine; that's appropriate. And that can be sold in the west.