Well, certainly the thought has occurred to me that rather than going to the premiers first and trying to cut a deal and then submitting it to the people, as was done in Charlottetown, you could do it the other way around. Simply design something, take it to the people, and if it's popular and supported by the electorate in a province, it becomes very difficult for a premier to say we nevertheless stand against this.
You can certainly campaign against it during that referendum, but once the people have spoken, it becomes very hard to work against what they've said. I suspect if that was done, we might move to the effective adoption of a convention that is similar to the Australians', that the vote of the majority in a province--or a state in their case--is what really counts.