Mr. Chairman, we are in Ontario.
All this to say that I'm trying to understand what it is that does not work with respect to dangerous offenders.
One of the explanations brought forth by the minister was that young offenders who are the subject of assessments and who should be seen by a professional—he referred to a psychiatrist—are not compelled to participate.
You seem to be saying that the National Parole Board, Correctional Services Canada and other bodies of this nature will not be further involved through this bill.
What will these bodies' role be if Bill C-27 is adopted? What do you think of the minister's explanation when he says that it is difficult to obtain dangerous offender designation in situations where young people or not-so-young people—it's as though people over 35 were old in this society—refuse to submit to an assessment and for all practical purposes it was impossible to obtain a designation?