Well, in these cases, with these people, you wouldn't have what happened with Clermont Bégin. He never went through any programs. He served his sentence and said, “Okay, bye-bye, I'm out.” Everybody says that this guy is going to repeat.
You would have people go to those hearings and understand how important it would be to go there to keep him there, no matter if it's 10 years, 15 years, 20 years. Why? Because there's no limit. If you are a designated dangerous offender, then there is no limit to your sentence. If you go into therapy and into those programs to try to improve yourself or to seek help, and it works, you will get out; if not, you won't play the system anymore.
So that would make a huge difference there. It wouldn't be the way it is, actually, where the burden is so high for crown attorneys.... And why should it still be for crown attorneys after you have three sentences for violent crimes? Why would it again be up to crown attorneys when it should be up to you, as a violent criminal, to prove that you're not a danger to society?