We support it is as long as it's an addition and not a substitution, because for us the reverse onus has to be if it's for a dangerous offender and for the long term. If it's an addition, we're okay with that.
If the reverse onus were for the long term but not for the dangerous offender designation, we would be against that amendment. The way we read it, your amendment suggests it would be reverse onus for both the designation of dangerous offender and the long term. That's what we're supporting.