I know there are some opinions in terms of interpreting the data along those lines. That is, the resources might not be there for those individuals because of some risk factors. Maybe they don't have stable employment patterns or the resources to defend themselves. This I'm not sure of.
To answer the question as to whether there is a margin of error in some of these evaluations, we don't have definitive research on that yet to clearly distinguish that. Is there a portion that should be designated? I don't know. You would have to look at that in a more focused way in that population, because they share some characteristics as well. They are a higher continued risk. I do not want to have the committee think that they are not at risk. There are some common risk factors they share with dangerous offenders and some they do not. That's the question one has to delineate on a case-based approach.