No, I don't, and I highly doubt that anything's going on. I want to be fair. I think there's an ongoing process that takes place in provincial attorney general offices across the country. I think there's a general recognition that there has to be a very onerous, hard look at all cases likes this. I think that goes on, on a regular basis, and that you'd have to be out of touch with what's happening in the real world in a provincial attorneys general office not to realize that this was important not only politically but, more importantly, in terms of public safety. So I think people in those offices are having a lot harder look at the cases as they roll through.
I'm not aware of anything formal being done, at least publicly, to review why. I heard the provincial attorney general say the legislation was different then, but I don't understand that. I heard it in a news release. I think that must be some sort of misunderstanding, probably, of the question, though.