Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm concerned about the narrow timelines, even for the sake of the ability of the clerk's office. This committee doesn't exist in isolation. The clerk's office has many other things to do, and they may not necessarily accord an amendment that comes in from this committee priority just because it came in. They have to be able to translate it and get it distributed.
That's why routine motions, in some respect, are routine. Whether it's 24 hours or 48 hours, it builds in enough flexibility for the process to be done and for it to be distributed. In putting them under the clock, what happens if they don't fulfill that because they have other things to do? It's not just for the benefit of the members; it's for the process itself, so that it goes. I think we need to have greater flexibility, not less. Setting a time for when it's distributed still allows them the flexibility for most of the day to be able to translate it and get it to people.