Seeing the extent of that type of conversation, I'd make a suggestion that committee members take it as they would a motion, and bring forward ideas and have them submitted ahead of time to suggest what Mr. Godfrey has raised as fundamental questions, rather than arrive and have what today has been a very long debate over relatively small things, considering the larger questions put before us.
In the sense of transparency and openness, why don't we have suggestions put forward to the committee prior to the time so they can be distributed and thought about, and we can come here ready to make decisions as opposed to going into a four-hour session over particulars?