Thank you, Chair, and thanks to the witnesses.
This is a quick question for Dr. Weaver. Having been involved with these reports before and having seen the UN at work, if I can put the term that way, is there not a consensus required with the authors who are present before anything gets printed?
I know there are authors from over 113 countries in this last report. Does this report represent, if there were a spectrum, the more alarmist end of interpretation of the science or the more conservative end of the interpretation?