I have some more questions, and we have a chairman who keeps us really tight.
We've heard the cost of carbon sequestration. The Pembina Institute said it was somewhere in the range of a dollar per barrel for oil, for instance. I did a little research on that, and 25% is only the transmission cost; 75% is the cost to capture and to store it. I was very surprised at that. But I have heard other evidence that suggests it could be 10 times that amount, because the technology is not there yet.
Is that fair to say that we don't know where it is? There is some technology—Norway has it, and some other countries have it—but the reality is that nobody has done it on massive scales like this. And if you increased the efficiency of your capture—instead of 50% you go to 100%, for instance—it drives up the price substantially.