Yes. I'll be very brief.
It's absolutely important for us in terms of that connection to the U.S. market, but in many ways our view is a slightly different one. Although they're our primary market for our products, we're competing against the rest of the world for that market in the United States. The burden we might bear in Canada becomes important when the bulk of that competition for the U.S. market may well be China or other jurisdictions that do not have a Kyoto burden.
So the message here, going into the next round of negotiations beyond 2012, is that the Canadian government, with others, should be looking to ensure that there is at least some burden, even if it's not equalized burdens, between developed and developing countries. You have to start putting everybody on a level playing field. We have a part playing field right now. That's one thing.
The other reality is that there is a component of the U.S. industry that we do compete with, absolutely. It's better to have a level playing field than not, so that's a key point for us.