There are maybe two answers to your question. First, the companies that are involved in ICON certainly are not all just pursuing carbon capture and storage alone. All of us are very interested in our own energy costs, so we're working on energy conservation and on new technology for extracting oil and gas that's less energy-intensive, and in some cases on renewables. My company, for example, is involved in wind power, as well as in ethanol and biodiesel. Those are alternatives that are all important parts of “wedges” in what's called a wedge concept for addressing climate change. That will continue.
With respect to your question on the possibility of other ways to do CO2 reductions in Ontario, we certainly believe there may be some potential to use carbon capture and storage on the large coal-fired power stations in Ontario. They're nearing the end of their life, so you get to the similar debate about whether you would spend a lot of money to retrofit something that's near the end of its life or essentially build brand new facilities, which could be gasification plants, along with carbon capture and storage. That would address the air pollution issue from older-style coal-fired stations as well as make it possible to capture that CO2 and move it to a secure geologic location.