Actually, Mr. Delbeke, I have some other questions I'd like to get to, and I actually have a minimum amount of time in which to ask them.
In terms of investing in projects in China, for example, there are some interesting other possibilities. China has an expensive space program. They have an expensive nuclear weapons program. They are undergoing a multi-billion-dollar facelift for their Olympics.
In some respects, we're setting up a system in which companies that aren't able to make a target in the short term are going to have to look at investing in projects. Let's just take a Canadian company that chooses--as you say, it's a free choice--to invest in a CDM project in China, thereby helping to underwrite the cleanup of their environment over there. Interestingly, competitively, on the other side of it, China is in a position to launch $10,000 cars into our market, which could hurt other Canadian companies.
We end up in some interesting situations with this type of a trading system. Ms. Donnelly, you raised the issue of investing in projects that helped the largest hog competitor compete with or out-compete our own people here. Does this not concern anyone here, that in this rush to clean up the global environment we're also creating some difficult competitive positions for our own industries here at home?
Ms. Donnelly, do you want to comment on that?