Absolutely.
Basically, if you're looking at financing a project with a combination of equity and debt, I have a project financing bible on my desk, and there's a chapter in there that says “no new technology”--if you're a lender, do not take technology risk, because you'll go beyond a normal financing risk. You do not lend to new technology unless that debt is guaranteed by a strong credit rating, such as a government, so that's one instrument the Canadian government could use. If they choose instead to use a combination of other instruments such as grants or loans, that's fine.
I have a very quick follow-up, by the way. I'm sorry, Mark, if I'm not answering your question, but Mr. Cullen asked a question that I didn't follow up on. With respect to the life cycle analysis of cellulose ethanol, there's a very positive net energy balance in the greenhouse gas emission reductions, based on studies done by reputable U.S. government labs. The Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago, for example, looked at GHG emission reductions from cellulose ethanol in the 80% to 90% range, and in some studies it's up to 100%.