There's an interesting thing in this, Mr. Chair, in that it's coming from Mr. Holland's benches, a government that, when in power, said they had a plan ready to meet Kyoto. And that's just a claim I've put forward in terms of substantive changes to the law of Canada required, budgetary or otherwise.
I would assume there is substance behind that claim. That substance could fall into amendments, I imagine, quite readily. If claims are being made by members around this committee for two things, urgency and capacity, and each party has made various claims on Kyoto and our abilities to meet it, then I assume they've done the legwork on it in their green plan that was issued when they were in government and in Mr. Dion's statements since in terms of confidence in meeting Kyoto objectives. Those are the amendments that the NDP have put forward and made public. If committee members have chosen not to do that or their parties have chosen not to do that work, then they have a lot of work ahead of them.