Like Mr. Jean, I'm a little confused here.
This is not said in any hostile way, but if there is an implication that there is spending, which process happens first? Do you pronounce on its acceptability on the royal recommendation issue, or do you not consider it because you've stood it aside and you don't come back and worry about that until you actually look at it? What's the sequence of events? If it turned out that it needed a royal recommendation, then it would be stood aside forever, so to speak, wouldn't it?