Just give me a moment. The amendment has not in fact been moved, but your point is taken.
The royal recommendation aspect of it is Marleau and Montpetit, page 711: “Bills which authorize new charges for purposes not anticipated in the Estimates” would be inadmissible. Depending on how you looked at this, you could decide that it does or it doesn't. It talks about designating, not establishing; it doesn't talk about paying for anything, and it has not been moved in any event.