I understand that members from three political parties support in principle the notion of significant area, but I still have questions about this.
I'd like to ask one of the movers of these amendments or Mr. Moffet whether they think that the designation of a significant area by the federal government is limited to land under federal jurisdiction or whether it can extend to land under provincial jurisdiction. Is it felt here that, because of this amendment, a significant area could very well be on provincial land and not simply be limited to land under federal jurisdiction?