I'm wondering whether or not—Firstly, he didn't actually answer the question as to why “provincial and territorial” instead of “per sector”; that's the first thing. We all share the same shed, the same air. If it's going to be invested, if it's going to be taken from one particular sector that needs to improve its greenhouse gas efficiency, why is it not being reinvested in that instead of reinvested somewhere else? That's the first question. This does not make any logical sense to me, because we all share the same air.
I wonder whether he would consider a friendly amendment for 100% of the funds to stay in the province, if he's not prepared to look at a per sector basis, and whether or not he would look at a four-year period for an allocation instead of a two-year period, because I just do not believe, based upon my experience—and I would assume his, since he's been here longer than I—that government would allocate or do anything within a two-year period. The application process itself will take that long, in my opinion.
So I'd like to hear why per province or territory instead of per sector, and whether he would consider those two amendments.