Like previously, we certainly wish to be ambitious, but also we want to be realistic. So we've given ourselves, as Mr. McGuinty said in the previous discussion, room to manoeuvre. Clearly these targets can be adjusted as we go along. However, partly because of work done by, I guess, the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy, which talked about a 60% target and not even using 1990 as the baseline, we would very much like to be able to accept that as a friendly amendment. But concern and prudence for giving ourselves a bit of room to manoeuvre, as we have done on the 2020 target, means that we can't accept this, much as we'd like to, as a friendly amendment.
On March 27th, 2007. See this statement in context.