I have two quick closing comments, Chair.
What we would like to see as Canadians is a cleaner environment, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and reduced pollution levels. Mr. McGuinty and Mr. Cullen have both suggested it could be done under CEPA as we have it now. The government believes no, that CEPA needed to be strengthened.
The question that is left unanswered, then, is this. If CEPA would have been able to accomplish that, in the opinion of the Liberals, why wasn't it done?
We believe clearly that CEPA needs to be strengthened. This would have done that, but then continuing this debate and Mr. Cullen's argument, I would suggest it's irrational when it's actually.... As Mr. Jean pointed out, we've taken away the tools, we've taken away the Clean Air Act, and now they want to argue about whether the Clean Air Act was achievable.
Once you've gutted the Clean Air Act part, I think there's no point in continuing the debate.