A collector's item, indeed.
The point of the effort today, though, and I think this is instructive for us as we go ahead with further debate, is to argue on the merits of the options available, as opposed to argue on who failed Canadians on the environment and when, because that's just a slippery slope for us to go.
The options represented on this particular amendment right here, on clause 38, as to whether it's better to trade a new section--which greenhouse gases would be controlled through there--or to use the section that exists right now.... We all heard evidence from different witnesses; there was a variance of views. We formulated our opinions on that. Let's just base our votes on that.
I encourage committee members to resist as much as possible...and to just deal with the merits of the argument.