Evidence of meeting #24 for Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Carol Buckley  Director General, Office of Energy Efficiency, Department of Natural Resources
Brenda MacKenzie  Legal Counsel, Department of Justice
Guylaine Roy  Director General, Environmental Affairs, Department of Transport
Oriana Trombetti  Acting General Counsel and Associate Head, Transport, Justice Canada
Catherine Higgens  Director, Environmental Initiatives Division, Department of Transport

8:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

I'll read the list of stood clauses. We have stood clauses 2, 3, 4, 4.1, 5, 5.1, 10, 10.1, 14, 15, 22, 24, and 34. So there's a fair list of stood clauses.

Mr. Jean.

8:20 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Mr. Chair, there are a fair number of stood clauses. There are less than 20, but all of those stood clauses relate to something that was passed or not passed. I would suggest it will be fairly simple once we straighten out in our own minds where it is we're going to go.

Quite frankly, the only reason I would agree with Mr. Warawa, besides the fact that we're on the same side of the table, is that it's logical. This is an important piece of legislation. I think all of us need to go home, put our thinking caps on, and spend some time on it, either tonight or tomorrow morning, before we come back and do a final push.

This bill is very important to Canadians, and we want to make sure we get the best opportunity possible to make sure we don't have any screw-ups on it from a committee perspective, not necessarily a party perspective. Then, at that time, we can come back tomorrow.

I think we should actually meet either at 10 o'clock or 11 o'clock. I know we're scheduled for both 9 a.m. and 11 a.m., but just to have an opportunity to go through it, I would say we have probably two hours of work left. I would suggest that we want to make sure it's done properly and that we haven't missed anything.

8:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Before I go to Mr. McGuinty, I will just point out that if we do come back and sit from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. tomorrow and we're not done, then we would be infringing on the environment committee from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., which we have already done once.

Mr. McGuinty.

8:20 p.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

I think we should meet at 9 o'clock tomorrow morning, Mr. Chair. I think we're scheduled to meet from 9 a.m to 11 a.m., and then from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Is that right?

8:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

It's only as a possibility.

8:20 p.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

It's only a possibility? So could we technically go on until 2 o'clock tomorrow, in this room? That gives us a full five hours to complete our work. That would be my suggestion.

8:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

I'm seeing nods around the table.

Mr. Cullen, do you have--

8:20 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Particularly if we come ready with the changes we need to make, I think it can go. We're prepared to make it go quite quickly, come tomorrow morning.

8:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Okay. Then this meeting is adjourned until 9 o'clock tomorrow morning.