Evidence of meeting #25 for Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

John Moffet  Acting Director General, Legislation and Regulatory Affairs, Environmental Stewardship Branch, Department of the Environment
Michel Arès  Legal Counsel, Department of Justice

March 29th, 2007 / 11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

He saw the light, Mr. Chair, he saw the light.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Mr. Moffet, would you like to make some comments here?

11:30 a.m.

Acting Director General, Legislation and Regulatory Affairs, Environmental Stewardship Branch, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

I appreciate all the members' support for this. This actually goes in the regulatory authority. So it's not authority for the minister to report; it's authority for the minister to require people, subject to regulations, to report. We believe it's very important.

I would request that the members consider one small suggestion, and that is, that this text is taken straight from part 5.1, which was exclusively focused on air and GHGs, and therefore the last words say “releases into the air of the substances”. Now that this is in part 5, which are toxic substances more generally, I wonder if members would consider changing it to “into the environment and air”, or maybe just “into the environment”, because we would like to be able to use this authority more broadly than just for air emissions.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

It's perhaps a reasonable suggestion, but it needs to come from a member as an amendment.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

I would so move, if that would be seen as a friendly amendment by Mr. Cullen.

11:30 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Very friendly, Chair.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Let me see if I have this right, Mr. Godfrey: “effects on the environment and human health from releases into the environment and the air”.

11:30 a.m.

Acting Director General, Legislation and Regulatory Affairs, Environmental Stewardship Branch, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

I actually think “and the air” is redundant.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Does “the environment” sum it up, Mr. Godfrey?

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

I believe it would.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

So the amendment would read:

(x.1) the monitoring of the substance and the reporting to either Minister of the effects on the environment and human health from releases into the environment of the substances; and

(Amendment as amended agreed to)

(Clause 14 as amended agreed to)

(On clause 22)

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

We'll go to clause 22 and amendment L-22.

Mr. McGuinty.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

Let me just get the appropriate wording, Mr. Chair.

There is a small revision to the numbering, to make sure that it is consistent with changes that have been made. The slight difference should read as follows, in the numbers below, after the word “following:”, “subsection 93(1), 103.05(2)”, and here we would change “103.07(6)” to “103.07(2)(b)”.

Would you like to see text on that, Mr. Jean?

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I would.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Is “or 140(1)” still valid?

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

I think the “140(1)” stays.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

That's the question. That remains?

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

Yes, it remains.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Is there any debate?

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I would like to see it in writing, Mr. Chair, and I think that's reasonable before we do anything. It refers to at least four sections. I'd like to see what it refers to, unless the Liberal member has a problem with that, of me seeing—

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

You're entitled to see whatever you want to see.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Great. Could I see it?

I'll just need a minute, Mr. Chair, to go through the sections it refers to, just to make sure that it's in order.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Should I call for a suspension?

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I don't need you to suspend necessarily, but I certainly need some opportunity to refer through the bill to what changes have been made, because they're amendments to amendments to amendments. So if I could just have a minute....

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

We will suspend briefly.