Evidence of meeting #3 for Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was air.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Chad Mariage
John Moffet  Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment
Carol Buckley  Director General, Office of Energy Efficiency, Department of Natural Resources
Guylaine Roy  Director General, Environmental Affairs, Department of Transport
Phil Blagden  Manager, Air Health Effects Division, Department of Health
Catherine Higgens  Director, Environmental Initiatives Division, Department of Transport

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

But could most of what's in the notice of intent be achieved by using CEPA?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

Right.

Could we deal with indoor air quality using CEPA if there were no Bill C-30? Do we have the authority to regulate indoor air quality now?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

If there were no Bill C-30, could we regulate motor vehicle and engine emissions?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

Emissions, but not fuel efficiency.

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

I didn't ask about fuel efficiency, I asked about emissions.

If there were no Bill C-30, could we regulate large final emitters?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

Do you mean, could we regulate GHG emissions from large final emitters?

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

Yes.

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

Then yes.

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

Didn't we in fact plan to have regulations under CEPA under way that would have put such regulations in by 2008?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

Can I assume that's a rhetorical question?

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

I just would like to have it on the record.

Are there any emission targets or timelines that CEPA wouldn't have the authority to help regulate?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

No, I don't think there's any impediment that CEPA imposes to establishing a regulatory timeline.

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

If there were no Bill C-30, and we only had CEPA, could we establish an emissions trading market?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

Yes. Again, I'd like to come back to the qualification that I provided to the question from Monsieur Bigras, I think, that the current provisions aren't broad enough to enable us to establish an efficient emissions trading market when we look at the kinds of regimes that have been established effectively in other countries.

But the short answer is, yes, we could establish emissions trading under CEPA.

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

Could there be penalties under CEPA for those who violated the provisions of an emissions trading market? Does it have the penalty powers?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

The current penalty powers would be applicable.

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

Well, one of the things that really comes through the deck is how great an act CEPA is, and what power it has, and, if Bill C-30 fails, how much we could do to achieve all of the ends that are being touted as the advantages of this new bill. Most of the language, I notice, deals with “improve”, “expand”, but it doesn't deal with the actual authority that exists, the broad authority to do most of what we talked about.

Is that a fair comment, that CEPA currently has the broad authority to do much of what would be part of any action plan on climate change?

8 p.m.

Acting Director General, Systems and Priorities, Department of the Environment

John Moffet

Yes, and that's precisely why the bill modifies CEPA instead of creating another piece of legislation. It builds on the sound foundation that CEPA provides.

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

If all else fails, there will always be CEPA.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

8 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

You're giving up the rest of your time?

8 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

Yes.

8 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Laurie Hawn

Okay. Mr. Jean.

8 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'm actually curious about a few other realms, just to understand the rationale behind the department. I'm interested in indoor and outdoor air qualities.

I understand, Mr. Blagden, that you are the expert on air quality indexes. Can you tell me what the NARSTO group is?