Let me give you the example that was outlined to me recently. If we were to move to the California standards by 2009, that would mean the Silverado that we build in Oshawa and is built in three other General Motors plants in the United States could not be sold in either California or in Canada. So 20% of the market is gone from General Motors. That means we have four assembly plants and one is going to go.
Common sense would tell you that if a country says you can't sell something in Canada and you have to close one plant, you are not going to close a U.S. plant and keep the Canadian plant open when you can sell the vehicle outside of California. So the answer is that there is a direct correlation between what the government does here on the large vehicles and the large engines in the short term, without giving some time to accommodate this.
I'm for regulation. I'm for the government living up to the 2010 commitment and the letters of understanding, but in terms of regulating beyond that, 25% by 2014 would be a very significant improvement. It would have to be phased in. It wouldn't all of a sudden be a 25% improvement in that one year.